Home / Computer and Technology / The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

Technology has paved its way in almost every aspect of human lifestyles. For your edification, this discussion

continues, as well as an addition to previous study formats. In offering this informative passage, the legal system is

just another profession that has been mastered by technology. We are aware of the court and PC stenographers recording

and tracking our legal system, but what about the C.G.A. System? The Computer Generated Animation Submission

can be entered into our American Court System. Admissible Evidence in criminal proceedings (ies) has been

registered as a previous case decided by the Supreme Court. As reported by Asher Hawkins, of the Legal

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

Intelligencer, arguments different from six Pennsylvania Supreme Court Judges concluded that a Judge of the

Common Motives of Lackawanna properly admitted the use of CGA during a murder case in first grade in

2002. Justice Sandra Schultz Newman wrote, “Society has become increasingly dependent on computers in our

business and personal lives …” She went on to say, “With every technological advancement, the practice of law

becomes more sophisticated and proportionate to the need to address any techno-phobia and become more willing to

embrace advances that can improve the efficiency of the legal system. “Prosecution teams, including

Forensic Pathologists and Crime Scene Reconstructionists, presented a murder case to the jury; the prosecutor’s

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

version … the defendant did not have and/or did not have access to this tool. One argument against this court

procedure is that of a defendant, a poor person, capable of commissioning an equivalent production. In other words,

would the defense be able to compare the costs associated with bringing prosecutions to court? Another court

suggested it would be wiser to exclude CGA evidence if an indigent or poor defendant could not afford the costs of

“equivalent production.” The basic cost can be above $ 20,000.00. Another legal professional commented on

whether the cost (s) of the CGA was worth the cost. Judges have also taken note of the fact that CGA’s are becoming

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

less and less expensive to produce and can be a vital tool in expediting the expedition of court cases. In any case, pre-

trial motions including CGA evidence should be treated with respect. Jury instructions and indigent defendants

(deprived of food, clothing, and other necessities of life due to poverty; in need; poor; poor, poor) are required with

the permission of the court to present such evidence. The position of the judges was to ensure that Computer

Generated Animation was fair and accurate while allowing defendants the opportunity to challenge its foundation. It

simply an expression of opinions formulated by expert witnesses. Another justice stated his position … “I think it’s a

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

valuable tool, but a tool that needs to be used a little. I, the law does not, and should not; prohibit the proficient

professional employment of new technology in the courtroom. Each state has its court system. There is also a

system of federal courts. Decisions taken at the time of award by federal administrative agencies may be appealed to

a federal court. Similarly, decisions taken by state administrative agencies can be appealed to a state court. The

definition for adjudication (adjudication) is to give a judicial decision. In the administrative process, the proceeding

in which the administrative law judge hears and decides on issues that arise when an administrative agency accuses a

person or firm of function.

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

administering and enforcing acts. Typically, a state court system includes several levels, or levels, of courts – (a) trial

courts of limited jurisdiction, (b) trial courts of general jurisdiction, (c) courts of appeal, and (d) the highest court of

states (often called the State Supreme Court). Anyone who is a party to a case has the opportunity, and/or the right,

to invoke his / her case before a trial court and then, if he/she loses, before at least one level of the appellate court. In addition, if a federal statute of issue costs.

About admin

Check Also

Digital Trends and Technologies Transforming CX in Banking and Finance

Digital Trends and Technologies Transforming CX in Banking and

Digital Trends and Technologies Transforming CX in Banking and Finance The tastes of this new …

x